Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 55
Filter
1.
Cureus ; 15(4): e38024, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20238678

ABSTRACT

Objectives Immunocompromised patients, specifically those with solid organ transplants or cancer on chemotherapy, are at particularly high risk of severe pneumonia and opportunistic infections. In select patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is performed to provide high-quality samples for analysis. We compare BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States), a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, with standard of care diagnostics in BAL samples from immunocompromised patients to identify opportunities for this test to affect clinical decision making. Methods Patients hospitalized with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings who underwent evaluation with bronchoscopy between May 2019 to January 2020 were reviewed. Among those patients undergoing bronchoscopy, those who were immunocompromised were selected for inclusion in the study. BAL specimens submitted to the microbiology laboratory were chosen based on as part of the internal validation of the panel in comparison with sputum culture at our hospitals. We compared the outcomes of the multiplex PCR assay with traditional culture methods and evaluated the role of PCR assay in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy. Results Twenty-four patients were identified for testing with the multiplex PCR assay. Of the 24 patients, 16 were immunocompromised, all with solid or hematological malignancy or a history of organ transplant. Seventeen individual BAL samples from the 16 patients were reviewed. BAL culture results and the multiplex PCR assay were in agreement in 13 samples (76.5%). In four cases, the multiplex PCR assay identified a possible causative pathogen not detected by standard workup. The median time to de-escalation of antimicrobials was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 2-4) from the day of collection of the BAL samples. Conclusions Studies have established the additive role of multiplex PCR testing in addition to traditional diagnostic tools like sputum culture in diagnosing the etiology of pneumonia. Limited data exist specifically looking at immunocompromised patients, in whom a timely and accurate diagnosis is particularly important. There is a potential benefit for performing multiplex PCR assays as an additive diagnostic tool in BAL samples for these patients.

2.
Klimik Journal ; 35(3):179-185, 2022.
Article in Turkish | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2324000

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The probability of detecting viral and atypical agents in pneumonia patients has increased with the molecular methods used in recent years. We aimed to investigate pneumonia pathogens in endotracheal aspiration samples (ETA) of patients with severe community-acquired (CAP), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (m-PCR) and culture method. Methods: A prospective study was performed between December 2019 and October 2020. Patients 18 years and older with pneumonia followed in ICU on the mechanical ventilator were included. COVID-19 patients were excluded. Patients were grouped as CAP, HAP, and VAP. Two ETA samples were obtained from patients within 48 hours of the pneumonia diagnosis. Respiratory pathogens were investigated in samples by viral-bacterial m-PCR and bacterial culture methods. Results: 74 patients were included in the study. m-PCR of ETA samples achieved pathogen detection in 87.8% of patients compared with 58.1% with culture methods. The most common pathogen detected by m-PCR was Streptococcus pneumoniae in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. The most common pathogen isolated by culture was Staphylococcus aureus in both CAP and HAP patients and Klebsiella spp. in VAP patients. Atypical pneumonia pathogens were positive for 14.9% of the patients. Atypical pathogens were recovered from 28.5% of CAP patients and 23.1% of HAP patients. Viruses constituted all of the atypical pathogens recovered from HAP patients. No atypical pathogen was found in VAP patients. Conclusion: In this study, S. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen detected with m-PCR, and S. aureus and Klebsiella spp. were the most common pathogens detected with culture. Determination of microbial etiology of lower respiratory tract samples by molecular methods for diagnosing severe CAP and HAP may be beneficial in terms of treatment.

3.
Sci Total Environ ; 889: 164261, 2023 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315264

ABSTRACT

A multiplex quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)-based method was designed for the simultaneous detection of influenza A, SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, and measles virus. The performance of the multiplex assay was compared to four monoplex assays for relative quantification using standard quantification curves. Results showed that the multiplex assay had comparable linearity and analytical sensitivity to the monoplex assays, and the quantification parameters of both assays demonstrated minimal differences. Viral reporting recommendations for the multiplex method were estimated based on the corresponding limit of quantification (LOQ) and the limit of detection at 95 % confidence interval (LOD) values for each viral target. The LOQ was determined by the lowest nominal RNA concentrations where %CV values were ≤35 %. Corresponding LOD values for each viral target were between 15 and 25 gene copies per reaction (GC/rxn), and LOQ values were within 10 to 15 GC/rxn. The detection performance of a new multiplex assay was validated in the field by collecting composite wastewater samples from a local treatment facility and passive samples from three sewer shed locations. Results indicated that the assay could accurately estimate viral loads from various sample types, with samples collected from passive samplers showing a greater range of detectable viral concentrations than composite wastewater samples. This suggests that the sensitivity of the multiplex method may be improved when paired with more sensitive sampling methods. Laboratory and field results demonstrate the robustness and sensitivity of the multiplex assay and its applicability to detect the relative abundance of four viral targets among wastewater samples. Conventional monoplex RT-qPCR assays are suitable for diagnosing viral infections. However, multiplex analysis using wastewater provides a fast and cost-effective way to monitor viral diseases in a population or environment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Measles , Virus Diseases , Humans , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses , SARS-CoV-2 , Wastewater , Sensitivity and Specificity , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods
4.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 2021 Oct 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2307903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) represent a major cause of clinical visits worldwide. Viral epidemiology of RTIs in adults has been less studied compared to children. FilmArray respiratory panel (FA-RP), a multiplex, real time polymerase chain reaction method can simultaneously detect the nucleic acids of multiple pathogens. The purpose of this study is to analyze the epidemiology and clinical presentations of an RTI cohort. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital (CMUH) and China Medical University Children's Hospital (CMUCH), from January 2020 to June 2020. The FA-RP results were collected and analyzed according to upper versus lower RTIs. RESULTS: Among 253 respiratory samples tested, 135 (53.4%) were from adults and 118 (46.6%) from children. A total positive rate of 33.9% (86/253) was found, with 21.48% (29/135) in adults and 48.31% (57/118) in children. Human rhinovirus/Enterovirus (HRV/EV) was detected in most of the age groups and was more common in URIs. HRV/EV was found as a frequent co-detection virus. Among children, HRV/EV was the most detected pathogen of URIs, while the most predominant pathogen in LRIs was Mycoplasma pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: FA-RP has the potential to improve the detection rate of respiratory pathogens. The positive rate of FA-RP was higher in children compared to adults, which likely corresponds to the higher incidence of viral RTIs in children. Different pathogens may lead to different types of respiratory infections.

5.
J Infect ; 86(5): 462-475, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2289420

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The clinical impact of rapid sample-to-answer "syndromic" multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for respiratory viruses is not clearly established. We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate this impact for patients with possible acute respiratory tract infection in the hospital setting. METHODS: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases from 2012 to present and conference proceedings from 2021 for studies comparing clinical impact outcomes between multiplex PCR testing and standard testing. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies with 17,321 patient encounters were included in this review. Rapid multiplex PCR testing was associated with a reduction of - 24.22 h (95% CI -28.70 to -19.74 h) in the time to results. Hospital length of stay was decreased by -0.82 days (95% CI -1.52 to -0.11 days). Among influenza positive patients, antivirals were more likely to be given (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.48) and appropriate infection control facility use was more common with rapid multiplex PCR testing (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16-2.07). CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates a reduction in time to results and length of stay for patients overall along with improvements in appropriate antiviral and infection control management among influenza-positive patients. This evidence supports the routine use of rapid sample-to-answer multiplex PCR testing for respiratory viruses in the hospital setting.


Subject(s)
Influenza, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Viruses/genetics , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use
6.
Viruses ; 15(4)2023 03 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304589

ABSTRACT

Wastewater surveillance is considered a promising approach for COVID-19 surveillance in communities. In this study, we collected wastewater samples between November 2020 and February 2022 from twenty-three sites in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants for comparison to standard clinical sampling. A total of 215 wastewater samples were collected and tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time PCR with three targeted genes (N, E, and ORF1ab); 102 samples were positive (42.5%). The SARS-CoV-2 variants were determined by a multiplex PCR MassARRAY assay to distinguish four SARS-CoV-2 variants, including Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron. Multiple variants of Alpha-Delta and Delta-Omicron were detected in the wastewater samples in July 2021 and January 2022, respectively. These wastewater variant results mirrored the country data from clinical specimens deposited in GISAID. Our results demonstrated that wastewater surveillance using multiple signature mutation sites for SARS-CoV-2 variant detection is an appropriate strategy to monitor the presence of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the community at a low cost and with rapid turn-around time. However, it is essential to note that sequencing surveillance of wastewater samples should be considered complementary to whole genome sequencing of clinical samples to detect novel variants.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/genetics , Wastewater , Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Monitoring , Thailand
7.
Microbiol Spectr ; 11(3): e0404422, 2023 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2306459

ABSTRACT

Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) utilizes reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify respiratory pathogens. This panel qualitatively detects and identifies 14 viruses, including influenza virus A with H1 pdm09, H1, and H3 subtyping; influenza B; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus 1; parainfluenza virus 2; parainfluenza virus 3; parainfluenza virus 4; coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1); adenovirus; and human rhinovirus/enterovirus, and 3 bacteria, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Reproducibility, which was assessed with contrived specimens containing 12 targets at 3 clinical sites, with 2 operators at each site for 5 days, was 99.4% for Flu A H3 and Flu B, 98.9% for RSV, and 100% for the remaining 9 targets assayed. A multicenter clinical trial evaluated the performance of the BioCode RPP with 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 5 geographically distinct sites and revealed comparable performance between the BioCode RPP and FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FA-RP). Specifically, the positive percent agreements (PPAs) for various pathogens ranged between 80.8% and 100% compared with the FA-RP (1.7 and 2.0). Negative percent agreement ranged from 98.4% to 100% for BioCode RPP. The BioCode RPP also offers scalable automated testing capability of up to 96 specimens in a single run with total sample-to-result time under 5 h. The invalid rate of the BioCode RPP on initial testing was 1.0% (26/2,649). IMPORTANCE Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) is a high-throughput test that utilizes RT-PCR in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify 17 respiratory pathogens, including 14 viruses and 3 bacteria. This study summarizes data generated from a multicenter clinical trial evaluating the performance of the BioCode RPP on 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from five geographically distinct sites.


Subject(s)
Paramyxoviridae Infections , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Virus Diseases , Viruses , Humans , Virus Diseases/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Viruses/genetics , Bacteria , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Nasopharynx
8.
Heliyon ; 9(3): e14424, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266648

ABSTRACT

Introduction: We aimed to investigate the epidemiology of respiratory infections by season and age during the COVID-19 pandemic in a Japanese acute care hospital using multiplex PCR testing. Methods: We detected 21 pathogens in specimens from outpatients with respiratory symptoms at the Nara Prefecture General Medical Center using the multiplex PCR-based FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1 (bioMérieux). Results: Of the 3177 cases, 1215 (38.2%) were infected with at least one causative virus, and 1641 viruses were detected. The most common viruses detected were human rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 655) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (n = 264). Additionally, 321 (10.1%) of these cases were infected with two or more overlapping viruses. There were 23 cases of co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses. In the winter months from December 2020 to March 2021, the number of detected viruses was relatively low, followed by the surge of human rhinovirus/enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and parainfluenza type 3 in the spring and summer of 2021. While the number of human rhinovirus/entero-virus remained relatively high after the 2021 summer, the number of other viruses detected since September 2021 was low. After December 2021, the number of SARS-CoV-2 increased rapidly. Conclusions: Continuous monitoring of the epidemiology of respiratory infection is important to understand the prolonged impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

9.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 12(3)2023 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252483

ABSTRACT

Bacterial infection can occur in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 in various conditions, resulting in poorer outcomes, such as a higher death rate. This current systematic review was conducted in order to assess the efficiency of multiplex PCR in detecting bacterial infections in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, as well as to analyze the most common bacterial pathogens and other factors that interfere with this diagnosis. The research was conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, Taylor&Francis, Web of Science, and Wiley Online Library). Out of 290 studies, nine were included in the systematic review. The results supported the use of multiplex PCR in detecting bacteria, considering its high sensitivity and specificity rates. The most common bacterial pathogens found were Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Haemophilus influenzae. The median age at admission was 61.5 years, and the majority of patients were men (70.3%), out of a total of 1553 patients. The proportion of ICU admission was very high, with a pooled proportion of 52.6% over the analyzed studies, and an average duration of hospitalization of 13 days. The mortality rate was proportionally high, as was the rate of ICU admission, with a pooled mortality of 24.9%. It was discovered that 65.2% of all patients used antibiotics before admission, with or without medical prescription. Antibiotic treatment should be considered consciously, considering the high risks of developing antibiotic resistance.

10.
Orv Hetil ; 163(33): 1295-1302, 2022 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265633

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia plus Panel (bioMérieux) is a PCR method for microbiological diagnostics of lower respiratory infections. It can detect 18 bacteria, 9 viruses and 7 antibiotic resistance genes in real time. It can help the differential diagnosis and the choice of therapy of pneumonia, by giving results in two hours. OBJECTIVE: Reviewing the results of pneumonia PCR tests performed in our laboratory, and comparing them with the results of conventional culturing. METHOD: From October 2020 to September 2021, 820 lower respiratory tract samples were analyzed from inpatients with suspected pneumonia. Beside the PCR test, culturing was also performed. Oropharyngeal swabs were used for supplementary SARS-CoV-2 PCR. RESULTS: 40% of samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2-positive patients. In 60% of the samples, the PCR test detected pathogens or resistance genes. The most commonly detected pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii. 44% of the bacteria detected by PCR were not verified by culturing, whereas by culturing, several other bacteria, fungi and antibiotic resistance mechanisms were detected, which were not shown in the results of the multiplex PCR tests. In SARS-CoV-2-positive inpatients, 25.8% of the detected bacteria was S. aureus. The most common resistance gene was mecA/C (MRSA). In this group, other respiratory virus genes were detected in 2% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, whereas in 13% in samples of SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the importance of pathogens excluded from the PCR targets and multifactorial mechanisms of antibiotic resistance, culturing is recommended to perform beside pneumonia-specific multiplex PCR tests. Orv Hetil. 2022; 163(33): 1295-1302.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pneumonia , Bacteria , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus
11.
Arch Virol ; 168(3): 87, 2023 Feb 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2244493

ABSTRACT

A methodological approach based on reverse transcription (RT)-multiplex PCR followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) was implemented to identify multiple respiratory RNA viruses simultaneously. A convenience sampling from respiratory surveillance and SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in 2020 and 2021 in Montevideo, Uruguay, was analyzed. The results revealed the cocirculation of SARS-CoV-2 with human rhinovirus (hRV) A, B and C, human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) B, influenza A virus, and metapneumovirus B1. SARS-CoV-2 coinfections with hRV or hRSV B and influenza A virus coinfections with hRV C were identified in adults and/or children. This methodology combines the benefits of multiplex genomic amplification with the sensitivity and information provided by NGS. An advantage is that additional viral targets can be incorporated, making it a helpful tool to investigate the cocirculation and coinfections of respiratory viruses in pandemic and post-pandemic contexts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Influenza A virus , Influenza, Human , RNA Viruses , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Respiratory Tract Infections , Child , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , RNA , COVID-19 Testing , Coinfection/diagnosis , Coinfection/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , RNA Viruses/genetics , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human/genetics , Influenza A virus/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology
12.
Viruses ; 15(2)2023 02 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231559

ABSTRACT

Rift Valley fever (RVF) is a febrile vector-borne disease endemic in Africa and continues to spread in new territories. It is a climate-sensitive disease mostly triggered by abnormal rainfall patterns. The disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity in both humans and livestock. RVF is caused by the Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) of the genus Phlebovirus in the family Phenuiviridae. It is a tripartite RNA virus with three genomic segments: small (S), medium (M) and large (L). Pathogen genomic sequencing is becoming a routine procedure and a powerful tool for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of infectious organisms, including viruses. Inspired by the utility of amplicon-based sequencing demonstrated in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Ebola, Zika and West Nile viruses, we report an RVFV sample preparation based on amplicon multiplex polymerase chain reaction (amPCR) for template enrichment and reduction of background host contamination. The technology can be implemented rapidly to characterize and genotype RVFV during outbreaks in a near-real-time manner. To achieve this, we designed 74 multiplex primer sets covering the entire RVFV genome to specifically amplify the nucleic acid of RVFV in clinical samples from an animal tissue. Using this approach, we demonstrate achieving complete RVFV genome coverage even from samples containing a relatively low viral load. We report the first primer scheme approach of generating multiplex primer sets for a tripartite virus which can be replicated for other segmented viruses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rift Valley Fever , Rift Valley fever virus , Zika Virus Infection , Zika Virus , Animals , Humans , Rift Valley fever virus/genetics , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Genomics , COVID-19 Testing
13.
Vet Sci ; 10(1)2022 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2237122

ABSTRACT

Respiratory tract and intestinal diseases are common threats to feline health. Coinfection with multiple pathogens is not rare among clinical infectious cases. Rapid diagnosis of these coinfections is of great significance for timely and effective clinical treatment. In this study, two novel multiplex polymerase chain reactions (mPCRs) were established for simultaneous detection of four pathogens associated with the feline intestinal tract (feline coronavirus (FCoV), feline astrovirus (FeAstV), feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) and feline kobuvirus (FeKoV)) and five pathogens associated with the respiratory tract (feline calicivirus (FCV), feline herpesvirus 1 (FHV-1), feline leukemia virus (FeLV), Chlamydia felis (C. felis) and influenza A virus (IAV)). The results of sensitivity analysis revealed that the detection limits for FeKoV, FPV, FeAstV, FCoV, IAV, C. felis, FeLV, FHV-1 and FCV were 103, 104, 103, 103, 103, 104, 104, 105 and 105 copies/µL, respectively. Moreover, the specificity of the two mPCRs was high. When the two mPCRs were applied to clinical samples, the assay worked well. In conclusion, we established two mPCR methods that provide an excellent tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of pathogens associated with the feline respiratory and intestinal tracts.

14.
Microbiol Spectr ; : e0416222, 2023 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2223601

ABSTRACT

Under the strict quarantine policy imposed to combat the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic in Japan, the prevalence of respiratory infections by viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has been largely unknown. However, such information on viral circulation is important in order to develop better management policies that are based on scientific data. Here, we retrospectively investigated respiratory virus infections in individuals who visited a community hospital with respiratory symptoms between June of 2020 and September of 2021 with the use of the BioFire FilmArray Respiratory Panel 2.1. Virus was detected in 65 out of a total of 328 subjects, with SARS-CoV-2 (67.7%), rhino/enterovirus (18.5%), and parainfluenza virus 3 (7.7%) accounting for most of the infections. No influenza virus or respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections were detected. The monthly cases of rhino/enterovirus infection were highest from winter to spring, with this temporal pattern differing from that of SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 was detected more frequently (P < 0.001) in subjects with cough (31/104 cases, 29.8%) than in those without cough (13/224 cases, 5.8%), suggesting that cough might contribute to the prediction of COVID-19. Our findings also suggest that testing for rhino/enterovirus and parainfluenza virus 3, in addition to SARS-CoV-2, may be important for the rigorous diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. IMPORTANCE Influenza virus, RSV, adenovirus, and rhino/enterovirus were the major respiratory viruses before COVID-19 pandemic. Circulating respiratory viruses may have been affected by our strong quarantine policy during the COVID-19 pandemic. We checked the circulating respiratory viruses from our outpatients by using a multiplex PCR kit that had recently been released. SARS-CoV-2 was the most frequently detected virus, and it was followed by rhino/enterovirus and parainfluenza virus 3. No influenza virus or RSV infections were detected during our study period, suggesting that influenza virus and RSV became almost extinct. COVID-19 cases frequently experienced cough, and this frequency was statistically significantly higher than that observed in the cases without SARS-CoV-2 detection. The cough can be an indicator of COVID-19.

15.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(7): 942.e1-942.e6, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2210073

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the high diagnostic accuracy of the nasopharyngeal swab (including in intensive care unit (ICU) patients). This study aimed to compare nasopharyngeal swab and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) results for non-SARS-CoV-2 viruses in patients with suspected pneumonia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in one French academic hospital on consecutive adults from 2012 to 2018 and tested nasopharyngeal swab and BAL within 24 hours by using multiplex PCR. The agreement in pathogen detection between nasopharyngeal swab and BAL was evaluated. RESULTS: Patients were primarily men (n = 178/276, 64.5%), with a median age of 60 years (IQR: 51-68 years). Of the 276 patients, 169 (61%) were admitted to the ICU for acute respiratory distress. We detected at least one respiratory virus in 34.4% of the nasopharyngeal swabs (n = 95/276) and 29.0% of BAL (n = 80/276). Two or more viruses were detected in 2.5% of the nasopharyngeal swabs (n = 7/276) and 2.2% of BAL (n = 6/276). Rhinovirus/enteroviruses were the most frequently detected viral group in 10.2% (n = 29/285) of the nasopharyngeal swabs and 9.5% (n = 27/285) of BAL, followed by influenza A, detected in 5.6% (n = 16/285) of the nasopharyngeal swabs and 4.9% (n = 14/285) of BAL. Overall agreement was 83.7% (n = 231/276 (95% CI [78.7%, 87.7%])) (i.e. same pathogen or pathogen combination was identified in the nasopharyngeal swab and BAL for 231 patients). Rhinovirus/enterovirus (n = 29/231) and respiratory syncytial virus (n = 13/231) had the lowest agreement of 62.1% (n = 18/29 (95% CI [42.4%-78.7%])) and 61.5% (n = 8/13 (95% CI [32.3%-84.9%])), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: There was a good agreement between nasopharyngeal swabs and BAL in detecting respiratory viruses among adult patients with suspected pneumonia. However, these data still encourage BAL in the case of a negative nasopharyngeal swab.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viruses , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Bronchoalveolar Lavage , Nasopharynx
16.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 2023 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2180786

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Precise detection of respiratory pathogens by molecular method potentially may shorten the time to diagnose and reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. METHODS: Medical records of hospitalized children from January 2020 to June 2021 with acute respiratory illness who received a FilmArray RP for respiratory pathogens were reviewed and compared with data from diagnosis-matched patients without receiving the test. RESULTS: In total, 283 patients and 150 diagnosis-matched controls were included. Single pathogen was detected in 84.3% (193/229) of the patients. The most common pathogen was human rhinovirus/enterovirus (31.6%, 84/266), followed by respiratory syncytial virus (18.8%, 50/266) and adenovirus (15%, 40/266). Although antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) was significantly longer in FilmArray group than the control [7.1 ± 4.9 days vs 5.7 ± 2.7 days, P = 0.002], the former showed a higher intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate (3.9% vs 0%; P = 0.010). All ICU admissions were in FilmArray RP-positive group. There was no difference in antimicrobial DOT between FilmArray RP-positive and the negative groups, in all admissions, even after excluding ICU admissions. Antimicrobial DOT was shorter in the positive than negative group in patients with lower respiratory tract infections without admission to ICU [median (IQR): 6 (4-9) days vs 9 (4-12) days, P = 0.047]. CONCLUSIONS: Shorter antimicrobial DOTs were identified in children with lower respiratory tract infection admitted to general pediatric ward and with an identifiable respiratory pathogen, indicating a role of the multiplex PCR in reducing antimicrobial use for children with respiratory tract infection.

17.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(6): 734-743, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2177753

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We aimed at assessing the efficacy and safety on antibiotic exposure of a strategy combining a respiratory multiplex PCR (mPCR) with enlarged panel and daily procalcitonin (PCT) measurements, as compared with a conventional strategy, in adult patients who were critically ill with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. METHODS: This multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients admitted to 13 intensive care units (ICUs) in France. Patients were assigned (1:1) to the control strategy, in which antibiotic streamlining remained at the discretion of the physicians, or interventional strategy, consisting of using mPCR and daily PCT measurements within the first 7 days of randomization to streamline initial antibiotic therapy, with antibiotic continuation encouraged when PCT was >1 ng/mL and discouraged if < 1 ng/mL or decreased by 80% from baseline. All patients underwent conventional microbiological tests and cultures. The primary end point was antibiotic-free days at day 28. RESULTS: Between April 20th and November 23rd 2020, 194 patients were randomized, of whom 191 were retained in the intention-to-treat analysis. Respiratory bacterial co-infection was detected in 48.4% (45/93) and 21.4% (21/98) in the interventional and control group, respectively. The number of antibiotic-free days was 12.0 (0.0; 25.0) and 14.0 (0.0; 24.0) days, respectively (difference, -2.0, (95% CI, -10.6 to 6.6), p=0.89). Superinfection rates were high (51.6% and 48.5%, respectively). Mortality rates and ICU lengths of stay did not differ between groups. DISCUSSION: In severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, the mPCR/PCT algorithm strategy did not affect 28-day antibiotics exposure nor the major clinical outcomes, as compared with routine practice.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Procalcitonin/therapeutic use , COVID-19/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , COVID-19 Testing
18.
Springer Protocols Handbooks ; : 131-138, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2173508

ABSTRACT

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method for differential detection of turkey coronavirus (TCoV), infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), and bovine coronavirus (BCoV) is presented in this chapter. Primers are designed from the conserved or variable regions of nucleocapsid (N) or spike (S) protein genes of TCoV, IBV, and BCoV and used in the same PCR reaction. Reverse transcription followed by PCR reaction is used to amplify a portion of N or S gene of the corresponding coronaviruses. Two PCR products, a 356-bp band corresponding to N gene and a 727-bp band corresponding to S gene, are obtained for TCoV. In contrast, one PCR product of 356 bp corresponding to a fragment of N gene is obtained for IBV strains and one PCR product of 568 bp corresponding to a fragment of S gene is obtained for BCoV. Copyright © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016.

19.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results ; 13:274-279, 2022.
Article in English | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2124246

ABSTRACT

This study is conducted on patients infected with COVID19 Those who are hospitalized in intensive care units in to AL-Shifa Center at AL-Zahraa Teaching Hospital for the period from December 2021 to March 2021, for age groups (41-80 years) and of both sexes. As 50 swabs samples are collected two swabs for each patient;one for culture and other for PCR after direct extraction for DNA, in order to investigate S. aureus infections associated with the emerging corona virus. During the laboratory diagnosis, in culturing obtained 24 (48%) positive samples for S. aureus. The extent of resistance of some commonly used antibiotics against S. aureus are more resistant to antibiotics and by 100% to isolates a higher sensitivity to 12 antibiotics including rifampicin, vancomycin resist, methicillin and tetracyclin. PCR detection of bacterial pathogens 50 (100%) for 16s RNA, while the mecA genes was 38 (76%). and showed no correlation with ICU admission, mortality, and inflammation markers. Although patients who received antimicrobial treatment were more often admitted to the ICU and had a higher mortality rate, PCR pathogen detection was not significantly related to antimicrobial treatment.

20.
North Clin Istanb ; 9(5): 421-428, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2124114

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study is to determine the risk of coinfection with COVID-19 due to the high prevalence of viral agents in Istanbul in autumn (September, October, and November) and winter (December and January) and to investigate the effects of age, gender, season and clinical features on the development of coinfection with COVID-19. METHODS: In the routine studies of our hospital, COVID-19, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RTA kit, Turkiye) and Multiplex PCR Bio-Fire (Bio Merieux Company, France) methods were studied from the nasopharyngeal swab sample and the data were recorded. A total of 400 people with a mean age (7.91±17.80) were included in the study by retrospective scanning. RESULTS: Considering the virus distribution, Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), COVID-19, rhino/entero virus did not show a significant difference in autumn and winter, while H. metapneumovirus, adeno virus, influenza A significantly higher rates were observed in winter months. Parainfluenza (1, 2, 3, 4) and Corona OC43 were detected at a higher rate in autumn compared to other viruses. Double and triple coinfection rates with other viral agents were high for 2 years and younger. CONCLUSION: The risk of coinfection of COVID-19 with influenza A, RSV, parainfluenza, and rhino/entero virus was found to be higher than other viral agents. Especially in winter, the risk of coinfection with influenza A and COVID-19 increases. In terms of treatment management, coinfection should be investigated in risky patients and influenza a vaccine should be offered to risky groups.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL